The attacks on Trump
University are starting to bother me. I was the chief learning officer of Trump
University from its inception until 2007. At that point, Mr. Trump decided to
stop building the online learn by doing courses that I was hired to do and do
real estate seminars instead. He didn’t need me for that.
Here is my problem.
I don’t know if those seminars were shady or not. I wasn’t there and I wasn’t
consulted. However, some of the attacks and discussions and lawsuits are about
whether this was a state sanctioned university. We all make the assumption that
the government should determine if you can call yourself a university, and if
you can grant degrees.
A colleague (a
faculty member at a top university) wrote to me today and commented:
“it
will set a bad precedent that students can sue private universities for tuition claiming bad education!”
Will it? Universities sanctioned by the state and
lauded by official rankings grant degrees to students who simply amass
sufficient credits which they do by attending lectures and passing multiple
choice tests. Are these students getting a reasonable education? MY colleague s right to worry about lawsuits
from unhappy students, but possibly we should all be unhappy about the current
state of university education.
At the launch of
Trump U, I was quoted as saying:
"The problem with school is that school
is a little academic, a little theoretical, not necessarily practical,"
Schank said. "It doesn't necessarily serve the general public, who may
just want to know how to do something."
Some members of the
press printed only the first phrase of that and made fun of me saying that
“school is a little academic.” The
defenders of the system never concern themselves with the idea that everyone
must go to college simply assumes that colleges know what they are doing and
that what they are doing is meant to benefit students in a way they might care
about, like preparing them for employment. Bart Giamatti (at the time he was my
boss and the President of Yale) once said to me “we don’t do training Roger.”
Maybe it is time to re-think that idea.
I don’t know if
Trump U was fraudulent in some way but I can tell you that people keep calling
me to discuss this. The press asks me about the “unofficial” courses and I
respond asking what is so good about the official courses. (Yale Computer
Science students recently protested that their education wasn’t practical
enough and that Google wouldn’t hire them. They were right to complain. It
wouldn’t have happened on my watch.)
The important issue
to me (apart from Trump himself which of course is the real issue) is why it is
not possible to simply launch a different kind of school, (maybe one that does
not teach algebra or one that concentrates on job skills) without the government
telling you what you are doing is ok.
The government is hardly
the expert on education, and neither I think are faculty members whose interests
are typically research. Students should be
able to complain if the Yale education they got disppointed them in some way. As a professor at Yale for 15 years I can tell
you that Yale often disappointed its students. Many of them found their way
into my office eventually to complain about what they were being taught. For example, why are psychology students
learning to run experiments when they have no intention of being researchers and
simply want to know what is wrong with them or their family?
Trump U was trying to
do something different (at least at the beginning while I was there.) If it did
something wrong after I was told to stop building online learn by doing courses,
then people have a right to criticize it. But the state should stay out of the
business of sanctioning courses and schools.
All the state does is
reinforce old ideas
and make change impossible.
